Personal computers gone mad
I'm sorry about this but I really must comment on leader of the so-called opposition Michael Howard's recent comments on "political correctness". This kind of ties in with what I wrote in the last post. Obviously, nobody with a clue has used the phrase "politically correct" (which, by the way, has always been a derogatory term) in any context since it was revealed that all that bollocks about banning the word "blackboard", etc was made up by the Sun. Howard, however, seems to have decided that the tired anti-pc corner is the very one fron which he wishes to fight for the forthcoming election. It hardly needs pointing out how pathetic this is, but I'm going to anyway. Howard believes that British people are "driven mad" by political correctness, citing the example of schools replacing sports days with problem solving exercises. Shit policy this may be, but can someone please explain to me what exactly is "political", or, for that matter, "correct" about it? He goes on to mention the banning of England flags, the fact that kids don't play musical chairs in school anymore, and, rather vaguely, the "red tape" that police have to deal with when they arrest someone. In other words a bunch of irrelevant, unconnected issues that he can clumsily lump together and get all Daily Mail about, dumbly groping for the lowest of common denominators. At no point in his sad little rant does he define what he means by political corectness, and at one point he worryingly states that "a culture which fails to distinguish between right and wrong, in the name of equal 'rights' for all, is a distorted culture. That's right, the sick little thatcherite throwback actually puts the word rights in inverted commas. I'm guessing (I have to guess, because it isn't made clear) that by "politically correct", he means left wing. Well if the left exerts such influence on our society, which it must, if it is dominating government policy and driving the people mad, why is it almost completely unrepresented in British politics? Why are our elections dominated by three barely distinguishable centre-right parties? I almost feel jealous of the USA- at least they have a despotic human rights abuser to get rid of. All we have is a grinning union buster to keep in. Because, tragically, Blair is the lesser of the two evils. I feel it's more likely that the British public are being "driven mad" (or at least away from the polling booths) by dishonest, vacuous politicians who refuse to address real issues in a coherent manner and instead resort to high school-style popularity contests. Maybe. Perhaps.